Maricopa, Arizona election officials illegally broke into sealed election machines after they were tested, reprogrammed memory cards, and reinstalled them. VIDEO EVIDENCE
"Money is a new form of slavery, and distinguishable
from the old simply by the fact that it is impersonal --
that there is no human relation between master and slave." -- Leo Nikolaevich Tolstoi
(1828-1910) Russian writer http://libertytree.ca/quotes/Leo.Tolstoi.Quote.7B4C
THE ANSWERS WILL BE ON THE TIP OF YOUR TONGUE, BUT YOU JUST CAN'T QUITE REMEMBER THE CORRECT ANSWER.
Let's see how good your memory is.
Don't look at the answers yet, until the end.
Youngsters, you don't have a chance.
I was picky as to who I sent this to.
It had to be those who might actually remember.
So have some fun, my sharp-witted friends.
This is a test for the 'older kids'!
The answers are printed below, (after the questions) but don't cheat! Try toanswer them first...
01After the Lone Ranger saved the day and rode off into the sunset, the grateful citizens would ask,"Who was that masked man?"
Invariably, someone would answer, "I don't know, but he left this behind."
What did he leave behind?
A ______ ______.
02When the Beatles first came to the U.S. in early 1964, we all watched them on The __ ________ Show.
03"Get your kicks, __ _____ __!"
04The story you are about to see is true. The names have been changed to _______ ___ _______.'
05'In the jungle, the mighty jungle, ___ ____ ______ _______.'
06After the Twist, The Mashed Potato, and the Watusi, we 'danced' under a stick that was lowered as low as we could go in a dance called the '_____.'
07Nestle's makes the very best.. _________.'
08Satchmo was America 's 'Ambassador of Goodwill.' Our parents shared this great jazz trumpet player with us. His name was ____ _________.
09Who showed us how liquid get into chalk? ___ _________
10A Country Practice was based around the hospital in the fictional town of ________ _______.
11Some Americans who protested the Vietnam War did so by burning their _____ _____ .
12The cute little car with the engine in the back and the trunk in the front was called the VW. What other names did it go by? ______ or ___.
13In 1971, singer Don MacLean sang a song about, 'the day the music died.' This was a tribute to _____ _____.
14We can remember the first satellite placed into orbit. The Russians did it. It was called _______.
15One of the big fads of the late 50's and 60's was a large plastic ring that we twirled around our waist. It was called the _____-____.
16Things go better with ____!
17Who’s the leader of the club that’s made for you and me? ______ ______
18Who knows what secrets lie in the hearts of men? Only The ______ Knows!
19There was a song that came out in the 60's that was "a grave yard smash". It's name was the _______ ____!
20What puts a “Rose in every cheek”? ________
ANSWERS:
01The Lone Ranger left behind... A silver bullet
02The Ed Sullivan Show
03On Route 66
04To protect the innocent
05The Lion Sleeps Tonight
06The limbo
07Chocolate
08Louis Armstrong
09Mrs Marsh
10Wandin Valley
11Draft Cards (Not flags, as some may have guessed)
12Beetle or Bug
13Buddy Holly
14Sputnik
15Hula-hoop
16Coke
17Mickey Mouse
18Shadow
19Monster Mash
20Vegemite
Send this to your 'older' friends, (Better known as Seniors.) It will drive them crazy! And keep them busy and let them forget their aches and pains for a few minutes.
This is the latest breaking news relating to the Maui disaster.
A Danish "New-World-Disorder" enterprise called FALCK has replaced the American ambulance service on the Hawaiian islands of Maui and Kauai.
I'd like an explanation for why this American ambulance service is being eliminated.
Did they know something? Did they know too much? or maybe too little??
In addition to emphasizing Falck's problematic track record in California, I also point out Falck's devotion to the globalist "sustainable development goals" and involvement in the UN Global Compact.
For a quick overview of the blue and green symbolism, watch my video above.
Many of you emailed me information regarding the significance of the color blue in this disaster, and I plan to do an upcoming video about "color coded disasters."
"The Constitution is not neutral. It was designed to take the government off the backs of people." -- Justice William O. Douglas
(1898-1980), U. S. Supreme Court Justice
Source: The Court Years, 1939-1975, 1980 http://libertytree.ca/quotes/William.O..Douglas.Quote.D8CC
When Phoenix nurse Tarah Gramza realized that her daughter’s autoimmune disorder may have been caused by a vaccine, she looked into suing the vaccine manufacturer. Then she learned that the government won’t let her.
Instead, Gramza is beginning what could be a years-long legal battle with the U.S. government, trying to get an infinitesimal slice of the $3.5 billion fund set aside to compensate people who have adverse reactions to vaccines.
True heroism is remarkably sober, very undramatic. It is not the urge to surpass all others at whatever cost, but the urge to serve others, at whatever cost." -- Arthur Ashe
(1943-1993) American World No. 1 professional tennis player http://libertytree.ca/quotes/Arthur.Ashe.Quote.8B4F
With President Trump promising to appear for his civil trial opening today at New York, let me say first that I am not a lawyer. Nor am I a supporter of Mr. Trump for the GOP presidential nomination. Yet I am troubled by the New York Executive Law under which Mr. Trump and his associates have been found to have committed fraud, his business licenses canceled and various of his business units ordered dissolved within 10 days — all before a trial in which New York State seeks a staggering $250 million from The Donald.
This law strikes me as dangerous, certainly to anyone doing business in New York State. As the order by a New York Supreme Court judge, Arthur Engoron, acknowledges, no victim of Mr. Trump’s fraud “lodged a complaint” or “otherwise claimed damages.” Even a murder conviction requires that the victim’s body be found. In the Trump case, the body is alive and uncomplaining.
The order identifies a type of undamaged non-complainant, along with the crime, but names few: “defendants committed repeated and persistent fraud by preparing, certifying and submitting to lenders and insurers false and misleading financial statements.” Mostly, the order says simply “Donald Trump submitted SFCs,” or statements of financial condition, without saying to whom. Yet, the order does name Germany’s largest bank, Deutsche Bank, as one.
ADVERTISEMENT
If there were no self-identified victims and no harm was done, it seems over-harsh to revoke business licenses and dissolve businesses before trial and to seek a $250 million sanction. Yet, evidently, the law provides for this remedy. There are a few other aspects of the law that may raise eyebrows. First, for a finding of fraud under this statute, it is not necessary for someone to perpetrate actual fraud; it is enough that one “creates an atmosphere conducive to fraud.”
Second, there is no requirement of intent. Really?
Third, there is no standard of materiality. Apparently, a person can be prosecuted for defrauding someone of a paper clip. Fourth, there is no alternative standard for fraud in the instance of sophisticated victims (or non-victims, as the case may be). In the Trump case, Deutsche Bank is as much a victim as a fifth grader. So, Mr. Trump et al are guilty in the absence of intent, malice, materiality, damages or actual fraud.
ADVERTISEMENT
Finally, the remedies that the New York attorney general can seek in court are extraordinary, including the aforementioned pre-trial revocation of business licenses and dissolution of business entities. If there is actual fraud and an actual victim, of course, damages can be awarded to the victim. Fair enough. Yet, in the absence of a victim and damages, the attorney general can seek disgorgement of profits from the fraudulent activity. How does that make sense?
In Mr. Trump’s case, it doesn’t matter that the lenders and insurers sustained no damages and, in fact made money — loan interest and insurance premia. Mr. Trump et al must disgorge the profits Mr. Trump earned from the activity. To quote the order, “Disgorgement… focuses upon the gain to the wrongdoer as opposed to the loss to the victim.”
New York is seeking $250 million in disgorgement from Mr. Trump et al. Judge Engoron did not grant this relief in his order, but he may award it in the non-jury trial now underway. One might be wondering what might justify the exercise of such extraordinary powers by New York State authorities. You guessed it: protection of the public interest.
ADVERTISEMENT
The order offers a string of case citations: “courts have held that a state has a quasi-sovereign interest in protecting the integrity of the marketplace”; “Executive Law § 63(12) constituted proper exercises of the State’s regulation of businesses within its borders in the interest of securing an honest marketplace.” Yet, the New York attorney general is not the sole guardian of the marketplace.
The Securities and Exchange Commission oversees securities markets and investments nationwide; note that it provides exemption from much regulation for transactions between sophisticated parties. There are both federal and state banking and insurance regulators that provide oversight, including as to real estate transactions of the type involved in the Trump case. Arguably, these regulators are more expert in these areas than the New York attorney general.
In almost every dimension, the executive law as manifest in New York v. Trump appears duplicative of another more qualified regulatory structure and tilted almost to the point of presuming guilt rather than innocence. Moreover, it is intrusive, interjecting the state as referee into the marketplace, devaluing the “free” in free enterprise, and undermining the bedrock principle that markets are largely self-correcting, as in Adam Smith’s invisible hand.
Whether one likes or hates Mr. Trump, and despite the manifest flaws in Trump Organization financial statements, the excessive power being wielded against him under this law is worrying. Once government arrogates to itself this kind of overweening power, it seldom relinquishes it. New York v. Trump will be there as a dangerous precedent to cite in, and to justify, future cases.
paraprosdokian -- a sentence or expression in which the second part provides an unexpected resolution or contrast to the first part, as inI'd like to see you again, but I've lost my glasses.
Here are some examples:
1. Where there's a will, I want to be in it.
2. Since light travels faster than sound, some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
3. If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.
4. War does not determine who is right - only who is left.
5. Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.
6. They begin the evening news with 'Good Evening,' then proceed to tell you why it isn't.
7. To steal ideas from someone is plagiarism. To steal from many is called research.
8. In filling in an application, where it says, 'In case of emergency', notify: I put 'DOCTOR.'
9. I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was blaming you.
10. Women will never be equal to men until they can walk down the street with a bald head and a beer gut, and still think they look sexy.
11. Behind every successful man is his woman. Behind the fall of a successful man is usually another woman.
12. A clear conscience is the sign of a bad memory.
13. I used to be indecisive. Now I'm not so sure.
14. Nostalgia isn't what it used to be. Nor is there any future in it.
15. Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine.
16. Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in your garage makes you a car.
17. I'm supposed to respect my elders, but it’s getting harder and harder for me to find one now.
18. I am not arguing with you, I am explaining why you are wrong.
A - Back off and let those men who want to marry men, marry men. B - Allow those women who want to marry women, marry women. C - Allow those folks who want to abort their babies, abort their babies. In three generations, there will be no more Democrats.
Part II: 10 Poorest Cities in America (How did it happen?) City, State, % of People below the Poverty Level
1 Detroit, MI 32.5% 2 Buffalo, NY 29.9% 3 Cincinnati, OH 27.8% 4 Cleveland, OH 27.0%
5 Miami, FL 26. 5%
6 St. Louis, MO 26.8%
7 El Paso, TX 26.4% 8 Milwaukee, WI 26.2% 9 Philadelphia, PA 25.1% 10. Newark, NJ 24.2%
(Now, watch closely... at no time will the fingers leave the hands...) What do these top ten cities (over 250,000 pop.) with the highest poverty rate all have in common?
Detroit, MI - (1st on poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961
Buffalo, NY - (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954
Cincinnati, OH - (3rd) not since 1984
Cleveland, OH - (4th) not since 1989
Miami, FL - (5th) has never had a Republican mayor
St. Louis, MO - (6th) not since 1949
El Paso, TX - (7th) has never had a Republican mayor Milwaukee, WI - (8th) not since 1908
Philadelphia, PA - (9th) not since 1952
Newark, NJ - (10th) not since 1907
Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thingover and over again and expecting different results.'
It is the poor who habitually elect Democrats ... yet they are still POOR.
Part III:
You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away people’s initiative and independence.
You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves.
~ Abraham Lincoln
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him had better take a much closer look at the American Indian."
You beat Prime Minister Justin Trudeau at the Supreme Court of Canada.
The Supreme Court just ruled against Trudeau’s No More Pipelines Law (officially called the Impact Assessment Act).
Because of your support, the Canadian Taxpayers Federation’s lawyers were in court giving it to Trudeau’s legal team and sticking up for taxpayers and Canadian resources.
Here’s the main takeaway from the Supreme Court: Trudeau can’t use this legislation to stop premiers like Scott Moe or Danielle Smith or Blaine Higgs from developing resources to create jobs for people in their provinces.
Once Trudeau dreamed up his No More Pipelines law, you knew taxpayers needed to fight back.
When governments block resource development, taxpayers pay.
This Supreme Court victory is clearing the way to build pipelines and other key projects.
I need to remind you about something: YOU donated to our Supreme Court fight against the legislation. YOU won this victory. Make sure you celebrate this win.
Normally, I send out emails with a call to action. But today I just want to tell you one thing: THANK YOU
All my family is in Alberta, so I know first hand how much this win will mean to people.
Thank you for acting and sticking up for all Canadian taxpayers and resource workers.
Sincerely,
Franco
Federal Director – Canadian Taxpayers Federation
This message was sent to musclecar426@gmail.com. You are receiving this email because you joined our list through Taxpayer.com, gave a donation, signed a petition or attended an event.
President Trump’s best hope for delaying his January 6 criminal trial — or dismissing the charges entirely — could be a constitutional argument so exotic, based on facts so unusual, that it has never before been fully argued in a court of law.
Mr. Trump’s motion for dismissal, made in a filing to Judge Tanya Chutkan, that his acquittal by the Senate after his impeachment renders Special Counsel Jack Smith’s charges against him a species of double jeopardy means that the former president is gambling that one of the most ancient taboos in Anglo-American law can save him from prison.
The Fifth Amendment ordains that no person be “subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.” Part of the common law for nearly a millennium, courts see this prohibition on double jeopardy as so significant that it can be raised before a trial even begins — as Mr. Trump has now done — and is grounds for automatic dismissal.
Mr. Trump’s argument that the “United States Senate has previously tried and acquitted” him for “charges arising from the same course of conduct alleged” in Mr. Smith’s indictment is more bespoke, though, than a standard double jeopardy defense. It enlists the impeachment clause to persuade Judge Chutkan that the former president has already been tried for the events of January 6, 2021 — and the Senate was his jury.
That provision orders that a “party convicted” of impeachment “shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.” Mr. Trump maintains that the presence of the word “convicted” means that an acquittal following an impeachment trial frees that exonerated person from further scrutiny from the Department of Justice.
That same department, in a memorandum of law, has taken the position that an acquittal does not preclude further prosecution. The government, though, allows that it is a close call and that there is “a reasonable argument” for the view that the Constitution “should be read to bar prosecutions following acquittal by the Senate.” That is Mr. Trump’s position.
Should the case reach the Supreme Court, it appears as if at least one justice could be inclined to agree with the former president. Justice Samuel Alito, in a dissent in a 2020 case, Trump v. Vance, writes that prosecution after impeachment “is a consequence that can come about only after the Senate’s judgment, not during or prior to the Senate trial.”
A legal sage, though, is skeptical. Joshua Blackman allows to the Sun that “if an impeachment process couldn’t support a conviction, it might create hesitation about whether the criminal process should go down the same path.” However, he explains that impeachment is a “civil remedy” while a conviction in court is a criminal outcome. He maintains that an acquittal in the former does not preclude charges in the latter.
Mr. Blackman also observes that the charge for which Mr. Trump was impeached and acquitted — “incitement to insurrection” — is not the same one for which Mr. Smith has charged the former president. The special counsel opted for a passel of conspiracy statutes rather than the more serious insurrection charge, which, in addition to prison time, is punishable with a bar from holding office.
Mr. Trump, though, argues that Mr. Smith “lacks authority to second-guess the determination of acquittal made by the United States Senate,” because the “government—through Congress—already put President Trump on trial once, placing him in jeopardy for an alleged criminal offense arising from the same course of conduct alleged in the indictment.”
The former president’s attorneys hope to convince Judge Chutkan that even if the charges differ, that same “course of conduct” — efforts to overturn the result of the 2020 election — means that the special counsel’s charges are unconstitutionally redundant. Despite impeachment having emanated from Congress and the criminal charges from the DOJ, both those bodies are organs of the same “sovereign” — the federal government.
The principle that the same sovereign cannot charge sequentially for crimes sourced to the same conduct was eloquently put, in dissent, by Justices Neil Gorsuch and Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Justice Gorsuch, in words that could come to the aid of Mr. Trump, writes that “a free society does not allow its government to try the same individual for the same crime until it’s happy with the result.”
.Law of Mechanical Repair -After your hands become coated with grease, your nose will begin to itch and you'll have to pee.
2.Law of Gravity -Any tool, nut, bolt, screw, when dropped, will roll to the least accessible place in the universe.
3.Law of Probability -The probability of being watched is directly proportional to the stupidity of your act.
4.Law of Random Numbers -If you dial a wrong number, you never get a busy signal; someone always answers.
5.Variation Law -If you change lines (or traffic lanes), the one you were in willalways move faster than the one you are in now.
6.Law of the Bath -When the body is fully immersed in water, the telephone will ring.
7.Law of Close Encounters -The probability of meeting someone you know INCREASES dramatically when you are with someone you don't want to be seen with.
8.Law of the Result -When you try to prove to someone that a machine won't work, IT WILL!!!
9.Law of Biomechanics -The severity of the itch is inversely proportional to the reach.
10.Law of the Theater & Hockey Arena -At any event, the people whose seats are furthest from the aisle, alwaysarrive last. They are the ones who will leave their seats several times to gofor food, beer, or the toilet and who leave early before the end of theperformance or the game is over. The folks in the aisle seats come early,never move once, have long gangly legs or big bellies and stay to the bitter end of the performance. The aisle people also are very surly folk.
11.The Coffee Law -As soon as you sit down to a cup of hot coffee, your boss will ask you to do something which will last until the coffee is cold.
12.Murphy's Law of Lockers -If there are only 2 people in a locker room, they will have adjacent lockers.
13.Law of Physical Surfaces -The chances of an open-faced jelly sandwich landing face down on a floor aredirectly correlated to the newness and cost of the carpet or rug.
14.Law of Logical Argument -Anything is possible IF you don't know what you are talking about.
15.Law of Physical Appearance -If the clothes fit, they're ugly.
16.Law of Public Speaking --A CLOSED MOUTH GATHERS NO FEET!
17.Law of Commercial Marketing Strategy -As soon as you find a product that you really like, they will stop making it OR the store will stop selling it!
18.Doctors' Law -If you don't feel well, make an appointment to go to the doctor, by the time you get there, you'll feel better. But don't make an appointment andyou'll stay sick.
The Law of Television Entertainment
As soon as you find a television program that you really like, it will be cancelled.
..........On his 75th birthday, a man got a gift certificate from his wife.
The certificate paid for a visit to a medicine man living on a nearby reservation who was rumoured to have a wonderful cure for erectile dysfunction. After being persuaded, he drove to the reservation, handed his ticket to the medicine man, and wondered what he was in for. The old man handed a potion to him, and with a grip on his shoulder, warned, 'This is a powerful medicine. You take only a teaspoonful, and then say '1-2-3.' When you do, you will become more manly than you have ever been in your life, and you can perform as long as you want."
The man was encouraged. As he walked away, he turned and asked, "How do I stop the medicine from working?""Your partner must say '1-2-3-4,'" he responded, "but when she does, the medicine will not work again until the next full moon."He was very eager to see if it worked so he went home, showered, shaved, took a spoonful of the medicine, and then invited his wife to join him in the bedroom.
When she came in, he took off his clothes and said, " 1-2-3!” Immediately, he was the manliest of men. His wife was excited and began throwing off her clothes, and then she asked, "What was the 1-2-3 for?"
And that, boys and girls, is why we should never end our sentences with a preposition, because we could end up with a dangling participle.
Trump Tower at New York City. AP/Ted Shaffrey, file
President Trump dances on stage during a commit to caucus rally, October 29, 2023, at Sioux City, Iowa. AP/Charlie Neibergall
