DISINFORMATION ON THE FDA'S PLAN TO TAKE CONTROL OF SUPPLEMENTS
Some of you may have received a negative article from IAHF (John Hammel) or the same info from Dr. Rath. We do not support IAHF or those who propagate bashing fellow health professionals to pump up their own egos. I personally know Dr. Laibow and her husband and I could not ask for a higher integrity couple. I have also met Mr. Hammel but will hold that opinion.
Dr. Laibow has done what others are still talking about. She have personally visited top government officials in dozens of countries worldwide and turned their heads away from adopting the Big Pharma negative standard for CODEX and instead they "get it" and are adopting a positive standard... and it is working. Perhaps the US is seeing the impact of her work already and is getting desperate with this new attempt.
Does the FDA *run by Big Pharma) have the legal authority to do this and start raiding or intimidating those who might go against their new internal directive, NO. Will this stop them from doing so anyway? You decide. From past experience, they have "approved" deadly drugs and pretty well do whatever they are directed to do just like the IRS does without ANY law giving them authority. In a Fascist world, it is Big Pharma running the FDA and in this administration do you think simple laws (like the Constitution) are obeyed? So, it's up to the people as it always is to take a stand and not be intimidated.
The worst thing to do is nothing. This is implied consent.
If IAHF thinks they should focus on CAFTA, more power to him. Do it. Dr. Laibow is doing what she does best, and more power to her. I tend to support people who speak the truth and support the good of others and get things done. Now it's up to you to determine which is which.